classic theosophy says the brand new testament should still no longer be examine actually, or on a superficial lifeless-letter level. The very Gospels imply the same conception.
The reality expressed by parables, myths and legends is deeper than in simple terms cloth information. The narrative of the impressive delivery of Jesus, for example, symbolizes the system of the first remarkable Initiation, no longer his cloth delivery. The teaching is true, but not its useless-letter interpretation.
It has been pointed out:
"The provoke of the first degree is as pure as a toddler. The middle and focus of his soul has been born already to the realm of immortal consciousness. His belief of lifestyles is firstly like that of a defenseless infant. His survival is precarious. he's threatened by using Herod, an expression of collective selfishness. inspite of the danger, he's already born and has been positioned within the very middle of cloth lifestyles, shedding light on all things around him."
And also:
"Humbleness, symbolized in Christian parlance via the terrible manger, refers back to the absence of pride or egocentrism. The presence of a number of animals around the holy newborn capacity the simple communion with all beings. the stars within the sky inform us that any such solidarity contains the complete universe." [1]
Jesus himself warned his disciples that he taught through parables, in Matthew 13:10-16. And yet, even nowadays americans attach themselves to the habit of intellectual laziness and browse the brand new testomony in a literal manner.
At this element, readers can legitimately ask: if the new testomony story concerning the birth of Jesus is an allegory, what about his actual birth?
Then uncomfortable records emerge.
just like his disciples, Jesus changed into a Jew. it should not be too plenty of a shock that the story of his delivery will also be found in the Jewish culture.
Helena Blavatsky shares this systematically suppressed story in an extended footnote at "Isis Unveiled". The narrative should be examine calmly and several times. It deserves being slowly examined, and meditated upon. in keeping with the narrative, a person named Ben-Panther in reality become the sinful father of Jesus, whose mom turned into innocent and free of sin.
Blavatsky begins with the aid of indicating a variety of sources:
"See Gaffarel's edition; Eliphas Levi's 'La Science des Esprits'; Mackenzie's 'Royal Masonic Cyclopædia'; 'Sepher Toldos Jeshu'; and different kabalistical and Rabbinical works."
Then she makes a summary of the records:
"The story given is that this. A virgin named Mariam, betrothed to a young man of the identify of Iohanan, become outraged through a different man named Ben Panther or Joseph Panther, says 'Sepher Toldos Jeshu'. Her betrothed, discovering of her misfortune, left her, at the equal time forgiving her. The child born turned into Jesus, named Joshua. Adopted by way of his uncle Rabbi Jehosuah, he turned into initiated into the key doctrine by Rabbi Elhanan, a kabalist, after which via the Egyptian priests, who consecrated him high Pontiff of the standard Secret Doctrine, due to his super mystic features. Upon his return into Judea his researching and powers excited the jealousy of the Rabbis, and that they publicly reproached him with his origin and insulted his mother. therefore the phrases attributed to Jesus at Cana: 'woman, what have I to do with thee?' (See John ii. 4.) His disciples having rebuked him along with his unkindness to his mom, Jesus repented, and having rea lized from them the particulars of the unhappy story, he declared that 'My mother has now not sinned, she has no longer misplaced her innocence; she is immaculate and yet she is a mother…… As for myself I don't have any father, during this world, i'm the Son of God and of humanity!' sublime phrases of self assurance and have confidence within the unseen vigor, however how deadly to the millions upon hundreds of thousands of men murdered on account of these very phrases being so totally misunderstood!" [2]
These are Blavatsky's phrases, reproducing the traditional Jewish view of Jesus. The suffering of Mary as proven in this historic narrative of Jesus' beginning does no harm to the essence of Christianity. [3]
more evidence is found in the indisputable fact that the authentic Templars – unlike the contemporary ones – shared the view that Jesus become a normal man or woman. while evaluating the extra recent and sick-suggested Templars with the genuine mystical Knights who existed unless the 14th century, Helena Blavatsky wrote:
"The existing-day Templars, adhering strictly as they do to the Bible, can hardly declare descent from people who didn't agree with in Christ, as God-man, or as the Saviour of the realm; who rejected the miracle of his beginning, and those performed via himself; who did not believe in transubstantiation, the saints, holy relics, purgatory, etc."
"The Christ Jesus was, of their opinion, a false prophet, but the man Jesus a Brother. They viewed John the Baptist as their client, but certainly not considered him within the light by which he's introduced in the Bible. They reverenced the doctrines of alchemy, astrology, magic, kabalistic talismans, and adhered to the key teachings of their chiefs in the East." [4]
The richness of the knowledge present in Christian tradition is not strengthened through suppressing statistics. precise Christians aren't terrified of truth. it is appropriate to are seeking for truth and to settle for it, in spite of the fact that it's frequently uncomfortable. Jesus didn't create any Church, as an instance, and on no account pointed out he become a god, nor the "handiest son" of a God.
Jesus changed into a "son of God", like any person else in his Jewish nation. by means of "Father in Heaven" he meant the immortal Spirit or higher self of each person.
NOTES:
[1] See "The Magic of the end of the year". involving different facets of the fantastic initiations, study "The Cosmic creation in every Foetus", and "Easter And The internal Rebirth". as a way to determine the symbolism of Christmas: "The Nativity Scene in Our Hearts" and "Don't Ask who's Born at Christmas".
[2] Blavatsky's phrases are reproduced from extent II of "Isis Unveiled", web page 386, footnote.
[3] outlined through Blavatsky in her footnote at "Isis", the book "La Science des Esprits", with the aid of Eliphas Levi, presents a few narratives of the delivery of Jesus according to the Jewish subculture. an important Talmud doc on the beginning of Jesus, covered in "La Science des Esprits", is posted online in Portuguese language: "Jesus Segundo o Talmude".
[4] From Blavatsky's textual content "The mystery of the Templars".___
study greater:
* A Prophecy on Judaism and Christianity.
* China and the Implosion of the West.
* Moshe Cordovero and Social Activism.___
Born in Brazil in 1952, Carlos Cardoso Aveline is a journalist by way of career and creator of the e-book "The fire and light of Theosophical Literature". He has other works published on esoteric philosophy and ecology. The editor of "The Aquarian Theosophist", Cardoso Aveline thinks Judaism, Jewish philosophy and Israel have critical roles to play within the moral rebirth the area needs within the existing century. He lives in Portugal and directs the Library and research middle of the impartial inn of Theosophists, whose linked websites consist of www.TheosophyOnline.com and www.HelenaBlavatsky.Org .
No comments:
Post a Comment