classic theosophy says the new testomony should still no longer be examine actually, or on a superficial useless-letter stage. The very Gospels suggest the equal theory.
The actuality expressed with the aid of parables, myths and legends is deeper than purely fabric facts. The narrative of the impressive delivery of Jesus, as an example, symbolizes the technique of the first tremendous Initiation, no longer his material birth. The teaching is correct, however now not its useless-letter interpretation.
It has been referred to:
"The provoke of the first degree is as pure as a baby. The core and center of attention of his soul has been born already to the realm of immortal cognizance. His notion of lifestyles is in the beginning like that of a defenseless infant. His survival is precarious. he's threatened by using Herod, an expression of collective selfishness. regardless of the danger, he is already born and has been positioned in the very middle of fabric existence, shedding light on all issues round him."
And additionally:
"Humbleness, symbolized in Christian parlance by way of the terrible manger, refers back to the absence of satisfaction or egocentrism. The presence of a lot of animals around the holy infant potential the fundamental communion with all beings. the celebs in the sky inform us that the sort of cohesion contains the entire universe." [1]
Jesus himself warned his disciples that he taught via parables, in Matthew 13:10-sixteen. And yet, even these days americans connect themselves to the addiction of intellectual laziness and browse the brand new testament in a literal method.
At this aspect, readers can legitimately ask: if the brand new testament story concerning the start of Jesus is an allegory, what about his exact birth?
Then uncomfortable facts emerge.
just like his disciples, Jesus became a Jew. it should not be too tons of a surprise that the story of his delivery can be found in the Jewish tradition.
Helena Blavatsky shares this systematically suppressed story in a protracted footnote at "Isis Unveiled". The narrative should be examine calmly and a couple of times. It deserves being slowly examined, and meditated upon. according to the narrative, a person named Ben-Panther basically become the sinful father of Jesus, whose mom became innocent and free of sin.
Blavatsky starts with the aid of indicating quite a lot of sources:
"See Gaffarel's version; Eliphas Levi's 'La Science des Esprits'; Mackenzie's 'Royal Masonic Cyclopædia'; 'Sepher Toldos Jeshu'; and different kabalistical and Rabbinical works."
Then she makes a abstract of the information:
"The story given is that this. A virgin named Mariam, betrothed to a younger man of the name of Iohanan, became outraged by way of a different man named Ben Panther or Joseph Panther, says 'Sepher Toldos Jeshu'. Her betrothed, researching of her misfortune, left her, on the identical time forgiving her. The newborn born turned into Jesus, named Joshua. Adopted with the aid of his uncle Rabbi Jehosuah, he changed into initiated into the secret doctrine by means of Rabbi Elhanan, a kabalist, and then via the Egyptian monks, who consecrated him high Pontiff of the frequent Secret Doctrine, due to his wonderful mystic qualities. Upon his return into Judea his studying and powers excited the jealousy of the Rabbis, and that they publicly reproached him along with his origin and insulted his mother. hence the words attributed to Jesus at Cana: 'girl, what have I to do with thee?' (See John ii. four.) His disciples having rebuked him with his unkindness to his mom, Jesus repent ed, and having realized from them the particulars of the unhappy story, he declared that 'My mom has now not sinned, she has not lost her innocence; she is immaculate and yet she is a mother…… As for myself I have no father, in this world, i am the Son of God and of humanity!' sublime words of self belief and have faith within the unseen vigour, but how fatal to the millions upon hundreds of thousands of guys murdered as a result of these very phrases being so entirely misunderstood!" [2]
These are Blavatsky's phrases, reproducing the natural Jewish view of Jesus. The suffering of Mary as proven during this ancient narrative of Jesus' start does no hurt to the essence of Christianity. [3]
more proof is present in the incontrovertible fact that the authentic Templars – in contrast to the contemporary ones – shared the view that Jesus turned into a normal individual. whereas evaluating the greater contemporary and sick-counseled Templars with the genuine mystical Knights who existed until the 14th century, Helena Blavatsky wrote:
"The latest-day Templars, adhering strictly as they do to the Bible, can infrequently claim descent from those that didn't consider in Christ, as God-man, or as the Saviour of the realm; who rejected the miracle of his beginning, and people carried out by way of himself; who didn't consider in transubstantiation, the saints, holy relics, purgatory, etc."
"The Christ Jesus changed into, of their opinion, a false prophet, but the man Jesus a Brother. They regarded John the Baptist as their buyer, however on no account seen him within the light during which he is offered in the Bible. They reverenced the doctrines of alchemy, astrology, magic, kabalistic talismans, and adhered to the key teachings of their chiefs within the East." [4]
The richness of the knowledge current in Christian subculture isn't bolstered through suppressing information. real Christians are not fearful of looking at truth. it is suitable to are seeking for for reality and to settle for it, notwithstanding it is often uncomfortable. Jesus didn't create any Church, for instance, and under no circumstances stated he became a god, nor the "best son" of a God.
Jesus become a "son of God", like any person else in his Jewish nation. by using "Father in Heaven" he intended the immortal Spirit or bigger self of each individual.
NOTES:
[1] See "The Magic of the end of the year". involving different points of the awesome initiations, study "The Cosmic creation in each Foetus", and "Easter And The inner Rebirth". in order to check the symbolism of Christmas: "The Nativity Scene in Our Hearts" and "Don't Ask who is Born at Christmas".
[2] Blavatsky's words are reproduced from volume II of "Isis Unveiled", web page 386, footnote.
[3] outlined via Blavatsky in her footnote at "Isis", the ebook "La Science des Esprits", by means of Eliphas Levi, presents a number of narratives of the beginning of Jesus in keeping with the Jewish lifestyle. a crucial Talmud doc on the birth of Jesus, blanketed in "La Science des Esprits", is published on-line in Portuguese language: "Jesus Segundo o Talmude".
[4] From Blavatsky's text "The mystery of the Templars".___
examine more:
* A Prophecy on Judaism and Christianity.
* China and the Implosion of the West.
* Moshe Cordovero and Social Activism.___
Born in Brazil in 1952, Carlos Cardoso Aveline is a journalist via profession and writer of the e-book "The fireplace and light of Theosophical Literature". He has other works published on esoteric philosophy and ecology. The editor of "The Aquarian Theosophist", Cardoso Aveline thinks Judaism, Jewish philosophy and Israel have crucial roles to play within the ethical rebirth the area wants within the current century. He lives in Portugal and directs the Library and analysis middle of the impartial resort of Theosophists, whose linked sites include www.TheosophyOnline.com and www.HelenaBlavatsky.Org .
No comments:
Post a Comment